In the News

Lots of health care issues in the news this week. These things keep us health advocates in tune and on our toes.

The Controversial
A court in the Indian city of Bombay (now Mumbai) rejects a couple's plea to abort their 25-week fetus in a key test case. The couple decided they wanted to abort the fetus after receiving test results indicating a chance of the baby being born with a defect. Ethical? Maybe that's subjective, but who can say not being in the situation. The couple says they do not have the resources to care for the sick child.

Immigrants Facing Deportation by U.S. Hospitals (Yikes!) This is a serious problem! People are being sent back to their native country, oftentimes to areas where proper care is lacking.

The Bad
Medication Increasingly Replaces Psychotherapy It's cheaper to cover medication than consistent therapy.So, even at the detriment of lots of people, therapy falls by the wayside.

The Hopeful
Honduras Promises To Invest In Its Farmers Hunger is a huge problem all over the world. Things like conflict and climate change are damaging to local food supplies. Genetic engineering of food is a bit controversial. But in this instance, it's helping to feed people in desperate need of food. I'm interested to see how this plays out and what kind of impact it has on both Honduras and genetic engineering.

FDA Oversight of tobacco. Stricter labeling requirements, prohibiting marketing to kids/teens sign me up! The argument made by the tobacco companies (with the exception of Phillip Morris, who would actually benefit from the new oversight) is that the FDA has too much to deal with already and they will get lost in the fold. To me it makes perfect sense that the FDA oversees a toxic substance we commonly put in our bodies.

The Unusual
Fish-icures: Flesh-Eating Fish Perform Pedicures. I'm not quite sure what to think of this. Maybe I'll have to try it. It's probably expensive though. I get a little bit of a shiver when thinking about sticking my feet into a tank of fish that I know will touch me. Ehhhh.

Mental Health Parity

Mental Health Parity
Apparently the hesitation to providing more coverage for mental health services is due to the lack of scientific evidence to such disorders as depression or agoraphobia. Still, anyone who has known someone who has suffered or has themselves suffered from mental illness, can attest to the real pain and suffering they cause. (Also, as the article states, studies are beginning to show biological signs of mental illness).
Another argument is that mental illness and addiction are "choices". While yes, depression and addiction stem from choices one makes in their lives, the mindset is often influenced by deeper emotions from the past. Without dealing with these emotional triggers, say through therapy, you're not going to change the mindset. At least not enough to make a lasting change. Pills may allow an individual some relief from the illness, but is much more effective when combined with some form of therapy. Covering up deep roots of problems with pills will only distract from the cause. Even the drug companies agree that therapy combined with drugs is more effective.
If nothing else, one would think that the incentive for insurance companies to provide equal coverage for mental health would be overall greater health. It's logical that providing effective treatment for mental illness would benefit an individual's overall health.